Comments for Tech Notes From The Trenches http://www.etagwerker.com a weblog about technology Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:08:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on the topsy ruby gem (rtopsy version 2.0) by etagwerker http://www.etagwerker.com/2010/01/the-topsy-ruby-gem-or-rtopsy-version-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-548 etagwerker Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:08:36 +0000 http://www.etagwerker.com/?p=298#comment-548 Yes, definitely. It was a great learning experience for me. I want to continue building open source projects. I look forward to working together again soon! :-) Yes, definitely.

It was a great learning experience for me. I want to continue building open source projects.

I look forward to working together again soon! :-)

]]> Comment on the topsy ruby gem (rtopsy version 2.0) by Wynn Netherland http://www.etagwerker.com/2010/01/the-topsy-ruby-gem-or-rtopsy-version-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-546 Wynn Netherland Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:26:49 +0000 http://www.etagwerker.com/?p=298#comment-546 For the record, I didn't find rtopsy until after I released my gem, or I would have just used yours. :-) It's been fun to work together on this one. Hopefully we can tag team another API soon! For the record, I didn’t find rtopsy until after I released my gem, or I would have just used yours. :-)

It’s been fun to work together on this one. Hopefully we can tag team another API soon!

]]> Comment on developer testing vs. tester testing by etagwerker http://www.etagwerker.com/2009/04/developer-testing-vs-tester-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-226 etagwerker Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:59:21 +0000 http://etagwerker.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-226 Thanks! A good testing phase is always necessary in order to engineer high-quality solutions and avoid client complaints. Also, a clearly define set of features is necessary for testing to know what is expected. These features should be reviewed, understood and approved by the client. Thanks!

A good testing phase is always necessary in order to engineer high-quality solutions and avoid client complaints.

Also, a clearly define set of features is necessary for testing to know what is expected. These features should be reviewed, understood and approved by the client.

]]> Comment on developer testing vs. tester testing by Marcelo Galarza http://www.etagwerker.com/2009/04/developer-testing-vs-tester-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-217 Marcelo Galarza Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:06:28 +0000 http://etagwerker.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-217 Pretty awesome article. Short as Effective. I totally agree with you, I would add it's essencial in a project to focus forces in each other's roles, and there is where the developers must rely on tester to do what they can do best, seek and break down system features. Quality assurance must never be underestimated if we want avoid our clients rejections ;). Pretty awesome article. Short as Effective. I totally agree with you, I would add it’s essencial in a project to focus forces in each other’s roles, and there is where the developers must rely on tester to do what they can do best, seek and break down system features.
Quality assurance must never be underestimated if we want avoid our clients rejections ;) .

]]> Comment on avoiding SVN conflicts using svn:ignore by admin http://www.etagwerker.com/2009/05/avoiding-svn-conflicts-using-svnignore/comment-page-1/#comment-7 admin Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:12:25 +0000 http://etagwerker.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-7 I have used GIT only once. It's probably the evolution of source repositories. But I don't think it has that many advantages over SVN. I have used GIT only once. It’s probably the evolution of source repositories. But I don’t think it has that many advantages over SVN.

]]> Comment on avoiding SVN conflicts using svn:ignore by vijai http://www.etagwerker.com/2009/05/avoiding-svn-conflicts-using-svnignore/comment-page-1/#comment-5 vijai Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:53:39 +0000 http://etagwerker.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-5 Have u looked at distributed repositories? for instance, git http://git-scm.com/ Have u looked at distributed repositories? for instance, git
http://git-scm.com/

]]> Comment on how to test your SMTP server with ActionMailer (using the Rails console) by Nathan Bertram http://www.etagwerker.com/2008/11/how-to-test-actionmailer-using-the-rails-console/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Nathan Bertram Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:13:08 +0000 http://etagwerker.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-2 Thanks a ton. Also try add to see what response you get back: ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :smtp ActionMailer::Base.raise_delivery_errors = true Thanks a ton. Also try add to see what response you get back:

ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :smtp
ActionMailer::Base.raise_delivery_errors = true

]]> Comment on dealing with SMTP client queues by phpBB + authenticated SMTP problem « tech notes http://www.etagwerker.com/2008/11/dealing-with-smtp-client-queues/comment-page-1/#comment-3 phpBB + authenticated SMTP problem « tech notes Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:45:30 +0000 http://etagwerker.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-3 [...] postfix deferred queue were full with wrongly constructed email requests. After clearing that (see previous post); the problem was [...] [...] postfix deferred queue were full with wrongly constructed email requests. After clearing that (see previous post); the problem was [...]

]]>